Comments on: An open letter to “rage-starved” tanks http://ducttape.etherjammer.com/2009/12/an-open-letter-to-rage-starved-tanks/ Rezzing stupid people since 2005 Wed, 07 Jul 2010 03:36:15 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Chris Anthony http://ducttape.etherjammer.com/2009/12/an-open-letter-to-rage-starved-tanks/#comment-368 Chris Anthony Thu, 31 Dec 2009 00:44:53 +0000 http://ducttape.etherjammer.com/?p=329#comment-368 <a href="#comment-366" rel="nofollow">@Skraps</a>, that's fair. :) And it was a pretty quiet change. But at the same time, people who know enough to know that PW:S <em>used</em> to prevent rage generation should know enough to realize that it doesn't any longer. ;) @Skraps, that’s fair. :) And it was a pretty quiet change. But at the same time, people who know enough to know that PW:S used to prevent rage generation should know enough to realize that it doesn’t any longer. ;)

]]> By: Skraps http://ducttape.etherjammer.com/2009/12/an-open-letter-to-rage-starved-tanks/#comment-366 Skraps Thu, 31 Dec 2009 00:00:43 +0000 http://ducttape.etherjammer.com/?p=329#comment-366 I hate to defend noobs, but it wasn't that long ago that a PW:Shield would prevent rage generation. The mechanic was changed in 3.1 to allow rage generation from absorbed damage. :) Skraps. I hate to defend noobs, but it wasn’t that long ago that a PW:Shield would prevent rage generation. The mechanic was changed in 3.1 to allow rage generation from absorbed damage.

:)

Skraps.

]]>