<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New Healing Priest T10 4-Piece Bonus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ducttape.etherjammer.com/2010/03/the-new-healing-priest-t10-4-piece-bonus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ducttape.etherjammer.com/2010/03/the-new-healing-priest-t10-4-piece-bonus/</link>
	<description>Rezzing stupid people since 2005</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 20:59:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Anthony</title>
		<link>http://ducttape.etherjammer.com/2010/03/the-new-healing-priest-t10-4-piece-bonus/#comment-454</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 18:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ducttape.etherjammer.com/?p=372#comment-454</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-453&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Daxlim&lt;/a&gt;, thanks for stopping by. :) I 100% endorse the idea that on a per-character basis, tier bonuses should be evaluated based on your individual playstyle. If you never use PW:S as a Disc priest (I&#039;m not sure why you&#039;d do that, but I guess I can see that it could be done), then this tier bonus is going to be totally worthless to you. ;) Unfortunately, it&#039;s not the sort of comparison I can rightly make at the moment; for medical reasons, I &lt;em&gt;can&#039;t&lt;/em&gt; raid, so I&#039;m probably never going to see Tier 10 anyway. ;)

I agree, too, that compared to other tier bonuses this is kind of a lackluster one, not only in terms of throughput but in terms of creativity (although again, that&#039;s based on looking at the bonuses and not seeing how they feel in play).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-453" rel="nofollow">@Daxlim</a>, thanks for stopping by. :) I 100% endorse the idea that on a per-character basis, tier bonuses should be evaluated based on your individual playstyle. If you never use PW:S as a Disc priest (I&#8217;m not sure why you&#8217;d do that, but I guess I can see that it could be done), then this tier bonus is going to be totally worthless to you. ;) Unfortunately, it&#8217;s not the sort of comparison I can rightly make at the moment; for medical reasons, I <em>can&#8217;t</em> raid, so I&#8217;m probably never going to see Tier 10 anyway. ;)</p>
<p>I agree, too, that compared to other tier bonuses this is kind of a lackluster one, not only in terms of throughput but in terms of creativity (although again, that&#8217;s based on looking at the bonuses and not seeing how they feel in play).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daxlim</title>
		<link>http://ducttape.etherjammer.com/2010/03/the-new-healing-priest-t10-4-piece-bonus/#comment-453</link>
		<dc:creator>Daxlim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 10:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ducttape.etherjammer.com/?p=372#comment-453</guid>
		<description>I usually calculate how effective the bonusses are by using my raid statistics.

Renew is usually 30% of my healing. CoH is 25%. So 10% over 25% is at least a bigger improvement than the original 5% over 30% would have been (glad they changed that). When I play disc, PW:S is usually around 50% of my healing, so 5% * 50% balances it out pretty well (though I do use shields as holy too, if there is no raid-healing disc priest, but not much).

What bothers me more is when I compare it to my shaman. My shaman tier 10 4x bonus is 25% increased critical strike bonus on chainheal. With roughtly 30% crit, that&#039;s a 11.25% bonus on an abilility that can easily be spammed 3 times in one cooldown of CoH. But just the fact that chainheal is a &quot;bread and butter&quot; spell is already saying a lot compared to CoH, which is just one of many. A shaman easilly get&#039;s +50% of his total healing from CH, so that&#039;s 11.25% * 50%, compared to a priests 25% CoH healing * 10%.

The 2x tier 9 priest bonus however, now that&#039;s a real bonus, so I would probably stick with 2x10, 2x9 myself and forget about the full t10 set.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I usually calculate how effective the bonusses are by using my raid statistics.</p>
<p>Renew is usually 30% of my healing. CoH is 25%. So 10% over 25% is at least a bigger improvement than the original 5% over 30% would have been (glad they changed that). When I play disc, PW:S is usually around 50% of my healing, so 5% * 50% balances it out pretty well (though I do use shields as holy too, if there is no raid-healing disc priest, but not much).</p>
<p>What bothers me more is when I compare it to my shaman. My shaman tier 10 4x bonus is 25% increased critical strike bonus on chainheal. With roughtly 30% crit, that&#8217;s a 11.25% bonus on an abilility that can easily be spammed 3 times in one cooldown of CoH. But just the fact that chainheal is a &#8220;bread and butter&#8221; spell is already saying a lot compared to CoH, which is just one of many. A shaman easilly get&#8217;s +50% of his total healing from CH, so that&#8217;s 11.25% * 50%, compared to a priests 25% CoH healing * 10%.</p>
<p>The 2x tier 9 priest bonus however, now that&#8217;s a real bonus, so I would probably stick with 2&#215;10, 2&#215;9 myself and forget about the full t10 set.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

